Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Moto E6 Plus, having a score of 89 against 73.4. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer and just a little thinner device than the Moto E6 Plus, although it is also a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a more vivid display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto E6 Plus features a better memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 5 takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a larger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Google Pixel 5 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.