Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, getting a score of 82.5 against 73.4. Even though LG V30S ThinQ is older and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's construction is still thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has an older 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better screen than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels quantity per inch of screen and a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a more MP back-facing camera, a way higher video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Moto E6 Plus, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.