Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Moto E6 Plus, having a general score of 81.3 against 73.4. LG V35 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner than the Moto E6 Plus, although it is a bit heavier and was released just a bit more than a year before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a larger back camera sensor, a larger aperture, a camera with more megapixels and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.