Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, getting a general score of 81.2 against 73.4. The LG V40 ThinQ is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, but LG managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much greater screen density, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ captures much better videos and photos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.