Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having an 87.1 score against 73.4. Even though LG Velvet and the Motorola Moto E6 Plus were released with only a couple months difference, LG Velvet's construction is just a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus. The LG Velvet features just a little better performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a much better looking display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little larger screen. LG Velvet features a way better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments.
The LG Velvet features a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.