Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than the Moto E6 Plus, having an 85.3 score against 73.4. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is notably newer and a lot thinner, but notably heavier than Moto E6 Plus.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit better CPU than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much sharper screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a higher display pixels density, a way bigger display and a much higher 1892 x 2688 resolution.
Moto E6 Plus features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a very superior battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures better photos and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.