Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a global score of 87.1 against 73.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, but it is noticeably heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto E6 Plus counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per display inch and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a larger aperture for better low light captures, a way more megapixels camera in the back, a way higher video quality and a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.