Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is much better than Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 global score. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is a lot heavier than Moto E6 Plus, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels and a greater pixel number per inch in the screen. Motorola razr (2020) has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) captures way better videos and photos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.