Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's score of 73.4. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's design is a lot newer and a bit thinner than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's, but it's notably heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a better screen pixels density, a little larger display and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Motorola Moto E6 Plus features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a back camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.