Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than Moto E6 Plus, getting an 83.8 score against 73.4. Galaxy A50's body is a little heavier but thinner than the Moto E6 Plus, and both of them were released only 6 months apart. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto E6 Plus. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A50 features a better looking display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with way more MP, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has better battery duration than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.