Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's general score of 73.4. Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a better display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite bigger display and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a back camera with lot more MP, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features longer battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.