Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a general score of 85.5 against 73.4. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 and Motorola Moto E6 Plus were released only 4 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A51's construction is somewhat heavier but just a little thinner.
The Galaxy A51 features a bit better performance than Moto E6 Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a sharper screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way better video resolution.
The Galaxy A51 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.