Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a 90.8 score against 73.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A51 5G's design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, but it's way heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better processing power than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a quite larger display, a greater display density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a lot better video definition and a camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.