Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, with a 90.7 score against 73.4. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, but it's also noticeably heavier. Galaxy A52 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit larger screen and a better pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.