Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a 91.1 score against 73.4. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, although it is also much heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit better performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a sharper screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy A52s features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy A52s has a really longer battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.