Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. Even though the Galaxy A70 and Motorola Moto E6 Plus were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy A70 design is a little thinner but also somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A70 has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a greater display density, a little bit bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
The Moto E6 Plus shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.