Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 overall score. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is way heavier than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a quite larger screen, a better screen density and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.