Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Moto E6 Plus, with an 85.2 score against 73.4. Although the Galaxy A9 (2018) is older and heavier than the Moto E6 Plus, it's body is still a little thinner. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a way better 1080 x 2220px resolution and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has longer battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3800mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.