Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Moto E6 Plus's overall score of 73.4. The Galaxy Fold design is a lot heavier but a lot thinner than Moto E6 Plus, and both were released only a couple of months apart. These phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user all the same OS features.
Galaxy Fold has just a little better processing power than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a better number of pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a much better 1536 x 2152px resolution.
Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold takes better pictures and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger aperture for better captures in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.