Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but extremely heavier than the Moto E6 Plus. The Galaxy Note 20 features a better screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a little larger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a better pixel density.
The Moto E6 Plus features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.