Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's score of 73.4. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, although it is also extremely heavier.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a way better pixel density and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a way better video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos, a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.