Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is better than Moto E6 Plus's global score of 73.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a lot older and heavier than the Moto E6 Plus, it's body is still a little bit thinner. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Note 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better looking display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.