Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is notably older and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's design is still somewhat thinner. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has more cpu cores (but slower). The Galaxy Note 5 has a much sharper display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy Note 5 takes much clearer videos and photos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a larger camera aperture, a more MP back camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher (4K) video resolution. Moto E6 Plus features a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto E6 Plus also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto E6 Plus and the Galaxy Note 5 feature really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.