Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a general score of 80.4 against 73.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto E6 Plus counts with a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto E6 Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better processing power than Moto E6 Plus. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.