Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, with an 89 score against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 body is heavier but a little thinner than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a better display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, a quite bigger display and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Note10 has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note10 has a better storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy Note10 features a superior camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video, a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.