Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Moto E6 Plus, getting an 86.2 score against 73.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body has the same thickness than Moto E6 Plus, but it's noticeably heavier. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has an older 11 version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a sharper display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit larger screen and a better pixels count per inch of display.
Galaxy Note10 Lite takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto E6 Plus, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.