Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the previous 4.4.2 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Note3's design is just a little thinner than Moto E6 Plus, but it is somewhat heavier and was released 6 years before.
Galaxy Note3 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a greater pixels count per display inch. Moto E6 Plus features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto E6 Plus also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cores (although they are slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a camera in the back with a 13 MP, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger sensor.
Galaxy Note3 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.