Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than the Moto E6 Plus, getting a score of 77.6 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a incredibly older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Moto E6 Plus, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit thinner anyway. Moto E6 Plus has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto E6 Plus also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a brighter display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and much more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a little bit better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a larger camera sensor, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot better video resolution.
Moto E6 Plus has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note4 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3220mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.