Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's general score of 73.4. Although Galaxy Note5 is extremely older and heavier than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's body is still somewhat thinner. The Galaxy Note5 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note5 features a more vivid display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way better pixel amount per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto E6 Plus has a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Note5 has a better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a bigger sensor, a way better video quality and a more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Moto E6 Plus and the Galaxy Note5 have quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.