Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, getting a score of 93.6 against 73.4. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is noticeably heavier but just a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and both were released only 4 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bit larger display, a much better pixels number per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 5G captures better videos and photos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Galaxy S10 5G has a way better battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.