Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is way better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, getting an 89.7 score against 73.4. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is somewhat heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a little larger screen. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots greater photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a way better battery duration than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.