Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Moto E6 Plus were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S20 construction is a bit thinner but also a little bit heavier than the Moto E6 Plus. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a quite bigger screen, a much greater display pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a superior camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light images, a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.