Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is way better than Moto E6 Plus's global score of 73.4. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is newer and just a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than Moto E6 Plus. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography, a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.