Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Moto E6 Plus, getting a overall score of 98 against 73.4. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a bit thicker and notably heavier phone than Moto E6 Plus.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bit larger screen, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a much higher count of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a lot larger sensor, a much higher video quality, a larger aperture for better low light images and videos and a back-facing camera with much more MP. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.