Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a overall score of 95.4 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is noticeably newer, but noticeably heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit larger display and a much higher display pixels density.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.