Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | -- |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.28 ounces | -- |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's overall score of 73.4. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S25 body is a lot thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus.
The Moto E6 Plus counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a higher pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution. Moto E6 Plus counts with more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S25 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.