Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than the Moto E6 Plus, having a global score of 77.8 against 73.4. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the previous 4.4.2 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a notably older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than the Moto E6 Plus.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has 4 less cpu cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a lot better looking display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way higher pixels number per inch of display.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto E6 Plus has a little better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S5 Sport captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a better 16 MP resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.