Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy S7 Active's construction is a lot older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Galaxy S7 Active features an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way better display pixel density.
The Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has 4 more CPU cores. Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S7 Active takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy S7 Active features greater battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.