Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is just a bit better than Moto E6 Plus, getting a 78.1 score against 73.4. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has the previous 8.0 Oreo version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's construction is thinner than the Moto E6 Plus, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released 4 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a brighter display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto E6 Plus counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto E6 Plus also has 4 more CPU cores (although slower).
The Moto E6 Plus features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photos, a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.