Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, getting an 81.9 score against 73.4. Although the Galaxy S8 Active is better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it must be noted that it is also a much older, extremely heavier and thicker cellphone. Galaxy S8 Active has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto E6 Plus. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with greater battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S8 Active shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.