Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Moto E6 Plus, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit superior processing unit than Moto E6 Plus. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Moto E6 Plus counts with just a bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto E6 Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Moto E6 Plus and Galaxy S9 both feature extremely similar batteries performance. The Galaxy S9 takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.