Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 282 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Moto E6 Plus, with a overall score of 80.1 against 73.4. Even being the best device in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a much heavier and incredibly thicker device. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the previous 8.0 Oreo version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better display than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way higher screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processing unit than Moto E6 Plus. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has as much storage capacity for apps and games as the Moto E6 Plus one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
The Moto E6 Plus takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor and a much tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto E6 Plus also counts with a better 13 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.