Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is much better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 global score. Although it's the best we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a more vivid display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Galaxy XCover Pro's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Moto E6 Plus one, both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processing unit than Moto E6 Plus. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 35 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a much smaller sensor capturing much worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.