Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the Moto E6 Plus, with an 88.5 score against 73.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Galaxy Z Flip and Moto E6 Plus were released with only 5 months difference, Galaxy Z Flip's body is somewhat thinner but heavier than Moto E6 Plus.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a sharper display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bit larger display, a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a much higher number of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Z Flip has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution, a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a little bit longer battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.