Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than Moto E6 Plus.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a quite larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a lot higher display density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.