Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 global score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's, but it is also heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a way better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels, a bigger display and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better performance than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.