Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. Apple iPhone X's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto E7 Plus, although it was released many years before. IPhone X has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a way greater count of pixels per inch of display.
The iPhone X has a better storage capacity for applications and games than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The iPhone X counts with a superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto E7 Plus takes just a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto E7 Plus also has a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.