Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. Although Apple iPhone XR is older than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's design is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner. The iPhone XR has a better performing processor than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a more vivid display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 828 x 1792 resolution and a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Moto E7 Plus counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto E7 Plus also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2942mAh. Moto E7 Plus shoots a bit better photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.