Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Moto E7 Plus, with a overall score of 84.2 against 75.7. Apple iPhone XS is an older phone than the Moto E7 Plus, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The iPhone XS features a lot better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPhone XS counts with a better CPU than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Moto E7 Plus has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has an 88% more battery capacity. The Moto E7 Plus counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has a much larger back camera sensor, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.