Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus's global score of 75.7. Google Pixel 3's construction is thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, even though it was released around 23 months before. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 3 has a better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a much better number of pixels per display inch. Moto E7 Plus takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also has a larger aperture for better low-light captures, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.